Crowdsourced quality testing for the iGaming industry.

HomeBlogFor iGaming operatorsCase Study: Identifying Conversion Gaps After the Click

Case Study: Identifying Conversion Gaps After the Click

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Affiliate and performance marketing teams working across multiple iGaming markets often face a critical issue:

Why high-intent traffic isn’t consistently converting once it reaches operator sites.

While acquisition metrics were strong, post-click performance lacked visibility—particularly across onboarding, payments, and early user engagement.

Problem

The team faced a common but hard-to-diagnose challenge:

Strong traffic performance, unclear conversion outcomes.

When faced with this, teams often try to test the flows themselves. But relying on a mixed bag of testers—freelancers, internal accounts, affiliate traffic, or local chat groups—creates noise rather than signal. Testing visibility is only as clear and reliable as the test case and testers make it.

Specifically, they lacked structured insight into:

  • Whether deposit flows were actually working
  • Bonus allocation and usability
  • CRM follow-up after registration
  • How different user types behave in the same flow

but not how real users experienced the journey.

This created a gap between:

  • Traffic delivered
  • Revenue realised

Solution

TESTA designed a real-user testing program focused on post-click conversion reality, moving away from unstructured ad-hoc testing to a deliberately controlled approach.

 

1. Segment-based UX testing

Instead of a mixed tester base, we structured the group deliberately:

  • 6 Experienced iGaming users
  • 6 New / low-experience users

This allowed the team to observe how different user types:

  • Navigate onboarding
  • Interpret payment options
  • Respond to friction or uncertainty

 

2. End-to-end journey validation

Each tester completed full user flows:

  • Registration
  • Deposit attempts (multiple methods)
  • Bonus interaction
  • First play

This ensured visibility across the entire conversion funnel, not isolated steps.

 

3. Payment flow validation in real conditions

Testing included:

  • Multiple deposit methods (including higher-friction options like bank transfer)
  • Real user decision-making (including hesitation or refusal to proceed)

This uncovered both:

  • Technical failures
  • Trust and usability barriers

 

4. CRM monitoring post-registration

To extend visibility beyond first interaction:

  • Testers forwarded CRM emails for 7 days post-registration
  • Captured how operators:
    • Follow up with unconverted users
    • Communicate offers and incentives

This added a layer of insight typically missing from QA testing.

 

5. Structured reporting with real-user artifacts

Each test included:

  • Video recordings
  • Screenshots
  • Step-by-step outcomes
  • Summary reports highlighting:
    • What worked
    • What required attention
    • What failed

Outcome

The testing revealed that conversion loss was not caused by a single issue—but by multiple small gaps across the journey.

 

Key findings:

 

1. Deposit success ≠ deposit completion

  • Some payment methods failed technically
  • Others were abandoned due to lack of user confidence or clarity

 

2. Bonus systems were inconsistent in practice

  • Bonuses were available, but not always:
    • Clearly communicated
    • Immediately claimable
    • Understood by new users

 

3. CRM flows existed—but lacked visibility

  • Without capturing real emails, post-registration engagement was effectively invisible
  • Forwarded CRM flows provided insight into conversion recovery attempts

 

4. User experience varied significantly by segment

  • Experienced users:
    • Pushed through friction
    • Exposed system inconsistencies
  • New users:
    • Hesitated earlier
    • Dropped off before completing key steps

Business impact

The team gained clear, actionable visibility into post-click performance, enabling them to:

  • Identify where conversion leakage occurs
  • Evaluate operator partners based on real user outcomes
  • Align acquisition strategy with actual user experience
  • Improve decision-making across markets and campaigns

Conclusion

Traffic performance alone doesn’t guarantee revenue.

Without visibility into the user journey after the click, critical conversion gaps remain hidden.

By combining:

  • Real users
  • Market-specific conditions
  • Segment-based testing

TESTA provided a clear picture of how acquisition translates into real-world outcomes.

Want to understand what happens after your users land? Get in touch to run a conversion-focused test in your key markets.

About the author

Ian McKinnon

TESTA Head of Marketing